I can write about nothing. I can write a lot about nothing. I really can write
a lot about nothing. I truely belive that I can write a lot about nothing. I
truely belive that I can write at great lengths about nothing. I can, as my
inner voice tells me, write at extremes about absolutely nothing. I can, and
will, write about nothing and all of its subsections in great detail. I can
write about essentially nothing at all stupendous amounts, which have just
begun. I can write about essentially nothing, or should I say, the nothing
essence, at mind boggling levels of detail. The nothing essence, which I
will write about in great levels of detal, is a subset of reality, yet one may
say the other way is correct. The nothing essence, which I will write about
in truely gargantuan levels of small and insignificant details, being both a
subset and a superset of reality, constitutes a paradox. The paradox of the
nothing essence which I have detailed in the last sentance, and I can write a
great deal about, can be aptly named the nothingness paradox, which can be
detailed as well. The nothingness paradox is derived from a view of a subset
of nothing, specifically the nothing essence, is an unanswerable one, since
it exists in the nothing, which I can write so very very much about. The
nothingness paradox exists within the nothing, proving that the nothing
contains something, and therefor differs from the nothing essence, something
which needs an explanation, which I will write in very great lengths. The
existance within the nothing yet outside the reality gives us a necessity to
relook our existance, and create a superset to the nothingness paradox, the
nothing essence, and the nothing, which I can write at extreme levels of
detail about. The complex containing the many parts of the theory as described
earlier, or the non theory for short, was derived of the ideas brought forth
when attempting to solve the nothingness paradox, is possibly a different
view of nothing, which I can write about a whole lot. The complex which is the
center of the non theory is called the reality complex, which is a complex
containing the nothingness paradox and the nothing essence in both
traditional and less orthodox forms, and contains nothing, which I truely
believe I can write about at great lengths, as well. The reality complex is
defined in two different ways, the orthodox or better known as the cognitive
nothingness relation theory, or the non orthodox the non theory view, which
both can be summed up by the cognitive/noncognotive division theory, which
contains an explanation of nothing, which I can write about. Then again I can
write about nothing.